GAME THREAD: Devils v Steelers: Sat 24th: Cup

The main chat area for hockey related discussion

Moderator: Mods

Post Reply
User avatar
mark
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3900
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:05 pm
Has Liked: 51 times
Been Liked: 500 times

Off to the land of music, mountains and an ice rink that should have been built with a larger capacity.
User avatar
NinjaBreadMark
Draft Pick
Draft Pick
Posts: 159
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 10:40 am
Location: Sheffield
Has Liked: 26 times
Been Liked: 23 times

According to Jonathan F on the ice line, a regulation win here would guarantee Steelers finish in the top spot in group A. An overtime/shoot out win would guarantee a top 2 spot, an overtime/shoot out loss would guarantee at least a spot in the play-in game.

A regulation loss would mean we need to pick up a point against Manchester to guarantee at least as spot in the play-in game, a win here would guarantee second place at least.

Steelers could potentially be overall top seeds if: we pick up 4 points from the last 2 games, and Belfast DON'T pick up 4 points from there remaining 2 games (after Fife did us a favour by beating Belfast yesterday)
User avatar
Doom
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1818
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2020 7:18 am
Has Liked: 158 times
Been Liked: 982 times

It was interesting listening to CBW on the Ice Line stating that we had a lot of offensive zone time during the weekend, but too much was perimeter with not enough shots and traffic in front of the netminder.

Is this something which is easily corrected through coaching or is it a recruitment failure?

At the start of the season I thought we'd signed too many creative players and not enough who could finish.

To my mind this squad is crying out for a Talbot or Roy who would get in front of a netminder and score the scruffy goals. I'd also suggest we'd benefit from a warrior type player like Peron, but Fox just doesn't seem to like that style of player.

Hopefully this is an issue which can be corrected with practice, but it will be difficult getting players to get in close to the netminder if it isn't their natural game.

Regards

Doom
User avatar
Bryan
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1590
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2020 8:23 pm
Has Liked: 357 times
Been Liked: 205 times

Doom wrote: ↑
Thu Oct 22, 2026 11:23 am
It was interesting listening to CBW on the Ice Line stating that we had a lot of offensive zone time during the weekend, but too much was perimeter with not enough shots and traffic in front of the netminder.

Is this something which is easily corrected through coaching or is it a recruitment failure?

At the start of the season I thought we'd signed too many creative players and not enough who could finish.

To my mind this squad is crying out for a Talbot or Roy who would get in front of a netminder and score the scruffy goals. I'd also suggest we'd benefit from a warrior type player like Peron, but Fox just doesn't seem to like that style of player.

Hopefully this is an issue which can be corrected with practice, but it will be difficult getting players to get in close to the netminder if it isn't their natural game.

Regards

Doom
Absolutely right all this. Exactly as I saw it. I seem to remember Gettinger saying how he was going to be type of player we need. Not much of sign of that up to now. Far too many of our efforts were from distance with little or no traffic in the keepers eyes. One extra point, the game was also crying out for Dowd who we missed a good deal. Not just for what he does but how he leads and set the tone.
Post Reply