I agree. The games come thick and fast and protecting Bowns by having the current GB 1-2 tandem training and playing together, sharing the workload, makes sense to me. Bowns wouldn't play for Steelers, would look bad if Panthers had not protected Whistle- how would that have looked for next season!?FlamesFan wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 1:49 amI thought it was a shrewd move tbh, could you see Bowns, who has had a bad injury this season, play all those games in a month? I’m not sure he’d have much left in the tank come the Worlds. I think it’s good for GB they’re on the same team tbh.Jayboy wrote: ↑Thu Mar 11, 2021 10:49 pmI've said the same thing over on social media, would have thought the fair option would be each of the 4 teams should have had 1 or the top 4 british netminders. I presume that would be Bowns, Whistle, Murphy plus one other. not knowing to much about our guy Churchfield, but I presume we will be running with a import goalie such as Duba, so that leaves Coventry as the natural choice for whistle to go to in a Trade, but then you have to ask the question who would Coventry be willing to trade to Nottingham?raetiamann wrote: ↑Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:38 pmIn view of Mike Hicks' comments regarding maximising ice time for the GB guys, am I the only one surprised that Panthers was allowed to sign our #1 & #2 netminders? One is almost certain to have less ice time.
I understand Panthers may wish to trade Whistle, however by that time other teams may have sorted themselves out. Also I'd hope Fox would say thanks but no thanks should we be approached , unless Bowns is offered, which of course is highly unlikely.![]()
So I think makes sense for GB needs prior to Worlds and the clubs for next season.




