Season Ticket holders and Covid 19

The main chat area for hockey related discussion

Moderator: Mods

User avatar
smbmetal
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 2560
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2020 11:34 am
Been Liked: 704 times

Bryan wrote:
Wed Dec 15, 2021 1:34 pm
Actually we have been in this situation all season. For medical reasons we could not take the considerable risk of Covid. I write to steelers before the season started. Our money had been with them since the previously aborted year. I said we were going to have to use streaming. We have done this fir every game. So we are paying twice. I asked if they could help with this.

I never got an answer.
Very poor from our club once again Bryan re communication.

Not to get answer from a genuine question is extremely unprofessional.

Unfortunately I think Steeler’s hand will soon be forced. Best we can hope for is a break for a month and a reduced schedule.

Playing behind closed doors won’t work financially.
User avatar
steeler pete
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 624
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2020 9:41 am
Has Liked: 105 times
Been Liked: 114 times

On the face of it this seems like a reasonable and sensible suggestion but the realty I feel is that it requires a lot more thought and consideration in the wider context of how COVID is and will affect the sport this winter.

Offering this to season ticket holders would reduce attendance, allow more space and possibly reduce transmission but, if st fans aren’t willing to attend why would pay on the day? A reduction in ticket sales would the put clubs potentially in financial difficulties. A webcast does not offer the same as a live event and would not attract the same revenue.

We are seeing games postponed now due to virus spread, how will this impact?

The Government seem reluctant to close down social/sporting events but there are no guarantees this will continue.

How would other clubs respond? Would they want access for travelling fans with tickets who would prefer to watch at home?

With these questions and uncertainty I think this is not a suggestion that could get a quick response.
User avatar
smbmetal
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 2560
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2020 11:34 am
Been Liked: 704 times

I think you're right Steeler Pete, the actual process of achieving free streaming for season ticket holders would be challenging, I completely agree.

However, a response like, "This is not something we (the club) are considering at this time" would have been the professional answer to Bryan's query.

Not just ignore it.
User avatar
IanC
New User
New User
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2021 10:59 am
Location: Sunny Sheffield

Nathan wrote:
Sat Dec 11, 2021 11:08 pm
Absolutely !

Won't happen though.


"cLuB will MiSS out on secondary spend!!!1!"
50/50 & Shirt Off Back could be offered online. I know Raffall take a cut but Steelers would still get most of the money
User avatar
mark
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3717
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:05 pm
Has Liked: 49 times
Been Liked: 474 times

They will miss even more secondary spend if people think it's unsafe to attend and then don't get a webcast unless they pay again. Nothing wrong with saying a season ticket can be both a physical seat and a webcast providing there is a simple way of ensuring it is one or the other for each game.

This is unlikely to be the last Covid variant and as it often gets worse in Winter making such a scheme viable is more likely to retain season ticket holders next year.
Post Reply