GAME THREAD: Steelers v Giants: Sat

The main chat area for hockey related discussion

Moderator: Mods

User avatar
Nathan
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1013
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 2:59 pm
Has Liked: 558 times
Been Liked: 174 times

I saw the high stick different.

Matter of opinion I guess.
User avatar
Jayboy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2573
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 9:43 am
Location: Chesterfield
Has Liked: 81 times
Been Liked: 698 times
Contact:

The Tansey incident was the very definition of high stick.. its actually wrote in the rules that a player is responsible for his own stick, however accidentally it may have been.. Tansey was clearly bleeding from his mouth I believe and is not the type of player to elaborate an injury to gain a penalty..

Jayboy

Image
User avatar
mark
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3673
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:05 pm
Has Liked: 48 times
Been Liked: 460 times

Nathan wrote:
Sat Mar 14, 2026 10:21 pm
I saw the high stick different.

Matter of opinion I guess.
It actually isn't a matter of opinion, it was a high stick and the player is responsible, there doesn't have to be intent. Clear as day on the replays.
User avatar
steeler pete
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 608
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2020 9:41 am
Has Liked: 101 times
Been Liked: 113 times

It was a frustrating game. I agree Keefe has our number and we were clueless as to how to break the deadlock.

Our best forward Balmas has been reduced to taking faceoffs. I’d like to bet his points tally has fallen off over the last few weeks as he’s doing a job the others couldn’t manage.
User avatar
smbmetal
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 2502
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2020 11:34 am
Been Liked: 686 times

It was a high stick all day long for me and there was a slash on Juusola was it? on his one on one that was missed at the end of the 2nd period as well.

Do I think we would have scored or those penalties change the game?…….

Nope.
User avatar
Bryan
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1442
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2020 8:23 pm
Has Liked: 292 times
Been Liked: 173 times

I couldn’t get to the game so can only rely on comments here and the stats. Strangely, they tell a rather different story. We had more shots, more shots on goal and even won more faceoffs. The tracking shows us mostly ahead and even the game win probability is higher. So what went wrong? Presumably our forwards were failing to take chances and their NM was having a blinder. Or is it what they say about lies and statistics?
User avatar
Jayboy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2573
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 9:43 am
Location: Chesterfield
Has Liked: 81 times
Been Liked: 698 times
Contact:

Bryan wrote:I couldn’t get to the game so can only rely on comments here and the stats. Strangely, they tell a rather different story. We had more shots, more shots on goal and even won more faceoffs. The tracking shows us mostly ahead and even the game win probability is higher. So what went wrong? Presumably our forwards were failing to take chances and their NM was having a blinder. Or is it what they say about lies and statistics?
We started well enough Bryon and looked to be completing well... but we were toothless up front and unfortunately garbage in defence.. non of it was Greenfield fault, some truly awful play in defence..

Jayboy

Image
User avatar
paul johnston
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 898
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 1:51 pm
Has Liked: 745 times
Been Liked: 290 times

Another flat, disappointing performance in a big game. Sadly this team frequently lacks character and leadership. Apart from the first 7-8 mins or so we were very flat. Jasper and the fourth line put up a fight but there wasn't much else. Some awful d zone play at times and some cracking individual mistakes from such as cormier and Harper. Very, very poor.
Post Reply